Home   About   Log in    Register   Contact  
ZooChat ZooChat
Go Back   ZooChat > Europe > United Kingdom > Howletts Wild Animal Park

Notices

Misinformation at Howletts » Howletts Wild Animal Park

More from Howletts Wild Animal Park: [discussion][gallery][maps]
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 5,038
Photos: 21
  #16
Old 28-05-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by taun View Post
Am sure that most of the keepers recognise that evidence points too there breeding programs (Barbary lions) as being a waste of time. However they are unlikely to voice so because they are employed by the park.

exactly- it must be rather depressing to have to go through the motions of this scheme if its really as pointless as it seems. I am not sure why Port Lympne are still breeding from their lions either- this seems to be increasing a population to no particular purpose now.
taun's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 1,064
Photos: 101
  #17
Old 28-05-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pertinax View Post
exactly- it must be rather depressing to have to go through the motions of this scheme if its really as pointless as it seems. I am not sure why Port Lympne are still breeding from their lions either- this seems to be increasing a population to no particular purpose now.
Am sure there is some insane reasoning! So they came claim more misdirected information. Like them returning Sumatran Rhinos to the wild! (Semi-wild more like it)

Last edited by taun; 28-05-2008 at 09:54 PM. Reason: grammer & Spelling
johnstoni's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 615
Photos: 21
  #18
Old 29-05-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by numn21 View Post
hello, im very intrigued where some of you get your information from?
from curious keeper
I'm hazarding a guess you may be a curious Howletts or PL keeper? Many people on this forum have been keepers, or still are, or involved in captive animal conservation/management, and will have a certain level of knowledge already, plus if you have a long memory and have read annual reports or IZN over the years you will often remember events no longer publicised by a collection or, in contrast, still very much publicised but incorrectly so.

I think the most critical discussion often happens with collections members have a great deal of respect for, the really bad zoos tend to just be ignored.
johnstoni's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 615
Photos: 21
  #19
Old 29-05-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pertinax View Post
I would never do that, its impolite and not my style... I prefer to wait and have a chat afterward and a keeper is hardly likely to be sympathetic to probing enquiries if you've just given them a hard time...
Oh it was meant entirely tongue in cheek, I was actually heckled by a bunch of creationists during a talk many years ago where I mentioned evolution during a talk. How do you deal with a creationist heckler?! I had no idea.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 5,038
Photos: 21
  #20
Old 29-05-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnstoni View Post
Oh it was meant entirely tongue in cheek, I was actually heckled by a bunch of creationists during a talk many years ago where I mentioned evolution during a talk. How do you deal with a creationist heckler?! I had no idea.
yeah, yeah, its okay, I know it wasn't serious...but if you did it it would ruin the chances of getting any serious information...
johnstoni's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 615
Photos: 21
  #21
Old 29-05-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by ashley-h View Post
So did they have hybrid Ocelots? It does say in their guidebook that they have released Ocelots back into the wild :S
To my knowledge, none of the ocelots in the UK are pure subspecies. Interestingly, the Rare Species Conservation Centre list Brazilian ocelot but they are not shown on ISIS to be any different to the rest of the UK population. If there is any collection likely to bring in pure animals it will be them.

The same was true with the few remaining Margay in Britain in the early 90's until the Ridgeway trust in Sussex recieved some rescued 'pure' animals from south America. These imports reflect the current moderate population of Margay in the UK, including those at Port Lympne, as I think the founder animals originated from the ridgeway trust. Strange though that ISIS doesn't list UK margay as a particular subspecies....as for ocelots, unless pure subspecies come in from rescue centres or the few in North American collections of known origin, I suspect the UK ocelot population was at that time and will remain generic, hence the inappropriate (and not repeated) release of ocelots by John Aspinall.

Yes, Pertinax is right about a very similar situation with the Woolly monkeys in Cornwall, again a release which was not thought through fully. It was when it became apparrent that the whole group must remain in captivity indefinitely due, in part to their mixed ancestry, that the sanctuary instigated the 'no breed' policy, although the group have naturally gravitated towards producing male offspring as the gene pool decreased, with only the one adult female left I think. I think it is a good thing they are concentrating on capuching rehabilitation these days, although educationally i hope there is always a place in the UK where you can see a thriving, multi-generational group of woolly monkeys in a semi-natural setting, regardless of their subspecies status....
johnstoni's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 615
Photos: 21
  #22
Old 29-05-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pertinax View Post
yeah, yeah, its okay, I know it wasn't serious...but if you did it it would ruin the chances of getting any serious information...
Oh but imagine it though, the shame of being on a day out with friends and being asked to leave for disrupting a talk on the basis of factual innaccuracies
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 5,038
Photos: 21
  #23
Old 29-05-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnstoni View Post
I'm hazarding a guess you may be a curious Howletts or PL keeper? Many people on this forum have been keepers, or still are, or involved in captive animal conservation/management, and will have a certain level of knowledge already, plus if you have a long memory and have read annual reports or IZN over the years you will often remember events no longer publicised by a collection or, in contrast, still very much publicised but incorrectly so.
I'd like to add that I've been visiting Howletts(& PL) for very many years- my first couple of visits to Howletts being before it was ever open to the public.
The majority of people working in the zoos tend to be younger and perhaps without the longterm knowledge that some of us have accumulated over many years. Obviously though they should have a better knowledge than outsiders of exactly what is currently going on in the places they work and this is where their input is valuable, to quash any misdirected speculation or innacuracy if it arises...

Last edited by Pertinax; 29-05-2008 at 02:39 AM.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 5,038
Photos: 21
  #24
Old 29-05-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnstoni View Post
Oh but imagine it though, the shame of being on a day out with friends and being asked to leave for disrupting a talk on the basis of factual innaccuracies
sometimes I've felt like taking over the talk myself....
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 5,038
Photos: 21
  #25
Old 29-05-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by taun View Post
So they came claim more misdirected information. Like them returning Sumatran Rhinos to the wild! (Semi-wild more like it)
yes, that was not good. I felt they were very wrong to suggest it, given they lost two females and Torgamba was being returned to a captive sanctuary, and it lost them some credibility in my opinion. But of course it sounds good...maybe that's why they continue the 'myth' of the lions as another example of their conservation work- but they do have several genuine reintroduction projects- gorillas, rhino etc etc so I don't understand why they would need to. Easier than disbanding them?

Last edited by Pertinax; 29-05-2008 at 02:37 AM.
johnstoni's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 615
Photos: 21
  #26
Old 30-05-2008

the most bizarre during those 'dodgy release' years would have to be the 'Burmese python release'.....done completely unilaterally, and remarkable in part because pythons were the first and only reptiles at the parks, so Howletts was not exactly renowned for its forays into reptile conservation. I don't know how scientific the release was, or how much follow-up or ecological impact data was gathered, it really came across as an opportunistic release of surplus python hatchlings from howletts rather than a long-term goal to repopulate asia with 'endangered' pythons.

I agree....it is astounding and impressive that the JAF has release rhino and lowland gorilla, with those credentials I often wonder why they maintain the less watertight claims apart from maybe to have a long list to speak of.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 5,038
Photos: 21
  #27
Old 30-05-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnstoni View Post
I agree....it is astounding and impressive that the JAF has release rhino and lowland gorilla, with those credentials I often wonder why they maintain the less watertight claims apart from maybe to have a long list to speak of.
It sounds better if you reel of a list of 'successes' rather than just with two species. In fact the earliest gorilla reintroductions were problematic too- the first two males sent from Howletts both died, and possibly others from a later group too I think. It was kept quiet until the head gorilla keeper at the time publicly 'came out' in an article in the press and quickly 'left' the parks soon after.

I believe those earliest gorilla releases may have been rather rushed, possibly because old Aspinall wanted to see it happen before he died... They seem to have been more successful since, and the black rhinos appear an ideal subject for this type of scheme. Port Lympne could almost singlehandedly make a real difference in Black Rhino conservation, I think, though I'm not sure if the Gorilla reintroductions are that worthwhile- too much against them?
johnstoni's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 615
Photos: 21
  #28
Old 30-05-2008

It is very much a symbolic conservation move, as in the richer north we are still completely blind to the simple relationships between the mineral wealth we plunder from those central african nations, and way in which the resulting poverty causes conflict and a misappropriation of their natural resources, let alone the desire to protect. But, as far as pointless symbolic conservation moves go, it is nonetheless pretty impressive and way ahead of that of many other establishments.
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: england
Posts: 5,038
Photos: 21
  #29
Old 31-05-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnstoni View Post
, as far as pointless symbolic conservation moves go, it is nonetheless pretty impressive and way ahead of that of many other establishments.
If they didn't remove and send out groups of young Gorillas to Africa, Howletts would have to stop breeding them now- or build more additional accomodation, or make them more available to other zoos.. I've heard that the existing enclosures aren't being added to with any new ones, but some of their groups (particularly in the original kitchen garden area) are overcrowded, particularly those still using the original run of cages which housed the first group of gorillas they ever had- so that's about fifty year old accomodation now and rather archaic. In a public zoo this would no doubt engender critisism (as at Chessington, despite that being a much larger enclosure) but Howletts seem to be able to get away with it on the strength of their reputation- "Howletts breed more Gorillas than anywhere else, so it must be okay..."
Tigerlemurguy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 905
Photos: 71
  #30
Old 31-05-2008

going back to the music festival, dont west midlands safari park do the same thing over there, it must have some stress on the animals.

and reading the whole of this forum, it seems such a shame to educate the british public with unreliable and false information, one of the main reasons for taking children to the zoo is to educate them, but if the zoos are giving out the wrong information, maybe we shouldnt bother.

i remember when i was little at a zoo they told me that a turtle was an amphibian and i refused to listen to information whcih would not benefit my education. what do they teach zookeepers at training courses now days?
__________________
James Butcher

My Photos
 


Bookmarks
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Howletts Wild Animal Park Howletts Gorillas update Pertinax United Kingdom 9 2 Days Ago 01:53 AM
Howletts Wild Animal Park Howletts Hadley United Kingdom 84 21-10-2008 03:00 AM
Howletts Wild Animal Park Heck's Macaques at Howletts robmv United Kingdom 26 19-08-2008 09:06 PM
Howletts Wild Animal Park howletts gorilla cages.. patrick United Kingdom 10 05-06-2007 06:47 AM
sumatran rhinos, whipsnades white rhinos and the gorillas at howletts..... patrick General Forum 4 27-04-2007 07:36 PM

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:19 PM.

Copyright © 2003-2008 Hampel Group Pty Ltd
(ACN 115 622 074)