Home   About   Log in    Register   Contact  
ZooChat ZooChat
Go Back   ZooChat > General > Nature and Animal Conservation

Notices

Colin the whale

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
torie's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 299
Photos: 78
  #1
Colin the whale
Old 21-08-2008

Im sure many of the frrum members from Sydney will know what i am talking about when i say colin the whale but for those who dont there is a very heated debate in sydney atm regarding the welfare of a baby humpback whale that became stranded in pit water almost a week ago now. the debate is about the what to do, if nature should be allowe dot take its course and the whale is left to die, if it should be taken into captivity and attempts made to rear it or if it should be uthinased. for us as advicates for zoos in most situtations i think this case raises some intresting ethical dilemas. we all want to see the whale live and have a happy ending (as im sure the media does too!) but personally i think that the best thing at this point would be to euthinase him, the chances of sucessful rearing in captivity are soo slim and there are no sutible facitiites to do it in.

what are others think should happen?


for more info check this artice for a start and then there are links to a few mor e and most sydney papers will have lots on him
The Sydney Morning Herald: national, world, business, entertainment, sport and technology news from Australia's leading newspaper.
mstickmanp's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 1,436
Photos: 771
  #2
Old 21-08-2008

Why doesn't Sea World take it? Sea World San Diego took an orphan humback a while back and were able to rear it and then released to the wild.
torie's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 299
Photos: 78
  #3
Old 21-08-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by mstickmanp View Post
Why doesn't Sea World take it? Sea World San Diego took an orphan humback a while back and were able to rear it and then released to the wild.
they talkd about sea world san deigo taking in whales but they had a HUGE pool that ehy could drain partially every two hours and the situation in San Deigo is diffrent in that once the whale is fully grown they can realase it not far from there and it will have food ect. The gold coast doesnt have facilities that even come close to being able to take a humpback whale, and no one knows the make up of humpback whale milk so inccorect formula could kill it. also once it is reared it would have to make the journey from queensland to antartica on its own before it reached a soild food supply.
MARK's Avatar
Moderator
Offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,574
Photos: 242
  #4
Old 21-08-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by mstickmanp View Post
Why doesn't Sea World take it? Sea World San Diego took an orphan humback a while back and were able to rear it and then released to the wild.
I think you will find SW San Deigo has much better tanks than we have in oz also SW here is around 1000kms north of Sydney, its a very sad case
ZooYouthBen's Avatar
Moderator
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Adelaide, SA, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Photos: 37
  #5
Old 21-08-2008

Does anyone know the phone number for Japan?
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Finley NSW
Posts: 233
  #6
Old 21-08-2008

It starts with 0011 81

I think their refrigeration ships might have gone home.
Newzooboy's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Petersfield, Hampshire, UK
Posts: 278
Photos: 212
  #7
Old 21-08-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by mstickmanp View Post
Why doesn't Sea World take it? Sea World San Diego took an orphan humback a while back and were able to rear it and then released to the wild.
That was a grey whale, not that it makes much difference because of all that has already been stated on this thread.
ZooYouthBen's Avatar
Moderator
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Adelaide, SA, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Photos: 37
  #8
Old 21-08-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty View Post
It starts with 0011 81

I think their refrigeration ships might have gone home.
I'm glad to see 'sick' Australian Humour back on this site :P
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Finley NSW
Posts: 233
  #9
Old 21-08-2008

Personally I think the money it would cost to possibly save it would be much better spent on other conservation programs. No one wants to see it die but in the bigger picture it is the best option. Nature is not kind and possibly the mother abandoned it for a reason. Even if the calf does not have anything wrong with it, it may be its mother with poor mothering instincts. Either way it is likely a benefit not to have this calf's genes to continue.

I think this link is very relevant as it is about the waste of funds to save individual animals instead of habitat or whole populations.

Wasting precious money on the conservation-irrelevant ConservationBytes.com
ZooYouthBen's Avatar
Moderator
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Adelaide, SA, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Photos: 37
  #10
Old 22-08-2008

Hes going to be Euthanased anyway, was on the news last night
torie's Avatar
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 299
Photos: 78
  #11
Old 22-08-2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZooYouthBen View Post
Hes going to be Euthanased anyway, was on the news last night
Its been done this morn and the responses in the papers have been crazy! i rsepect everyones opinions but the people from NPWS and the experts in the feild have all talked about how it was the only option and he died peacefull but one animal rights group tried to get a court injunction this morning to save him and were planing on using a giant funel and pump to force feed it... what exactly they planed to feed it im not sure....

P.s its been taken to Taronga for autopsy and turns out Colin the whale was actually a little girl!
ZooYouthBen's Avatar
Moderator
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Adelaide, SA, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Photos: 37
  #12
Old 22-08-2008

RIP Colleen
jay
Member
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: brisbane, qld, australia
Posts: 882
Photos: 39
  #13
Old 22-08-2008

In the normal course of things Colleen would have died and her body would have fed sharks and other marine animals. Yet no one seems concerned about the deprivation of food for them.
ZooYouthBen's Avatar
Moderator
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Adelaide, SA, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Photos: 37
  #14
Old 22-08-2008

thats a good point
MARK's Avatar
Moderator
Offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,574
Photos: 242
  #15
Old 22-08-2008

RIP. very sad case
 


Bookmarks
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Whale Watching Marc General Forum 7 16-03-2008 08:55 PM

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:34 AM.

Copyright © 2003-2008 Hampel Group Pty Ltd
(ACN 115 622 074)