
09-07-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by zooman
Is it time to follow Atlanta's experiance.Young males as soon as feasable are transfered to be with other males who are not going to be used for further breeding. As Atlanta has found this produces the best results for longterm bachealor groups.
|
Don't forget 'Bachelor groups' of gorilla males are really an artificial product of captivity- non-breeding males in the wild tend to avoid each other and travel about alone, not club together.
As its been found in captivity they'll tolerate each other this has become a recognised way of keeping 'spare' males. I think it largely depends on individual temperament how well and how long they'll live together though. Its true that young males that grew up together don't need to be introduced and will usually live harmoniously(?) together at maturity- but not always. Port Lympne have had problems with fighting and one (maybe two) of their silverback males are permanently separated nowadays. I always get the impression that within their groups, the Port Lympne silverbacks aren't very social with each other.
Paignton(UK) has a group of one adult male and several younger males of different ages. This is more a 'working group' with animals joining and then leaving as they mature to go to breeding groups, and then replaced by younger animals to keep the number at 5/6(there are currently 4). I would regard this as an ideal situation and it seems to work very well, at least with this particular group. Several males have already matured within this group and then left to join breeding groups.
Another thing to remember is the longer a young male can stay in a normal social group, the better socialised he'll be as an adult and a percentage of males that enter batchelor groups are still required for breeding later so this is important too.
Last edited by Pertinax; 09-07-2008 at 07:59 PM.
|